Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 PhD student of Islamic mysticism, Azad University, Research Sciences Department
2 Assistant professor of science at the department of comparative mysticism studies, director of the research group of contemporary wisdom and scientific faculty of the Islamic mysticism department of Azad University, research sciences department of Te
Abstract
The issue of unity of existence is considered one of the most important issues in the field of theology, mysticism and Islamic philosophy. And the most central topic in mystical thinking and one of the controversial and controversial issues in the history of theology and mysticism
It is considered Islamic and even among Western researchers. And almost all other discussions about mysticism and the word somehow return to this issue.
A group of theologians such as Mohammad Taher Qomi and Mirlohi were fundamentally opposed to the mystics' thought.
On the other hand, scholars such as Seyyed Haider Amoli, Faiz Kashani, and Mulla Sadra sought to use mystical theories in the interpretation of religious texts.
The late Allamah Muhammad Baqir Majlesi adopted a middle position between the two groups of scholars and accepted the principle of mystical interpretation based on the school of Shia imams in dealing with the great mystics of their thoughts.
In this article, a comparison has been made between Seyyed Haider Emali and Allameh Majlesi's view of mystical monotheism, and an attempt has been made to present a correct and understandable view of the theory of the unity of existence.
Keywords: theoretical mysticism, Kalam, Allameh Majlisi, Seyyed Haider Amoli, unity of existence, Ibn Arabi.
Keywords
)