mahboobe ghobadpoor; Hossein Shahbazpour
Abstract
Verse 59 of Surah Nisa, which is referred to as Ul al-Amr, is one of the most important proofs of the legitimacy of obedience in the field of religious and political authority in the Qur'an, which is dedicated to the issue of the leadership of the Islamic Ummah and the absolute obedience of all Muslims ...
Read More
Verse 59 of Surah Nisa, which is referred to as Ul al-Amr, is one of the most important proofs of the legitimacy of obedience in the field of religious and political authority in the Qur'an, which is dedicated to the issue of the leadership of the Islamic Ummah and the absolute obedience of all Muslims to them. According to this verse, believers are obliged to refer disputes and issues related to war and peace to the Supreme Leader, as a result, they have duties and powers in the field of community administration. Since the determination of Ul al-Amr's example is very important in the system of community administration, therefore, the scope of authority and the type of relationship of Ul al-Amr with the Messenger of God (PBUH) and the rulings of the society must be properly explained. Based on this, the main problem of this research is that according to the mentioned verse, can Vali-ye Faqih be considered an example of Ul al-Amr? In response to this issue, the approach of Shia and Sunni commentators is different; however, according to some of them, due to the lack of direct access to the infallible Imam, the term Ul al-Amr can also be applied to the fully qualified Supreme Leader. This research, using a descriptive-analytical method, tries to investigate the examples of Ul al-Amr in verse 59 of Surah Nisa.
ناصر شعبانی; Mostafa Soltani
Abstract
It has long been a place of dispute amongst the Muslims whether Imamate is a position to be granted to Imam through election or appointment; on the one hand, the Imamyya School, based on a rational explanation, holds that Imam is to be immediately appointed by the Word of God and His Messenger (PBUH); ...
Read More
It has long been a place of dispute amongst the Muslims whether Imamate is a position to be granted to Imam through election or appointment; on the one hand, the Imamyya School, based on a rational explanation, holds that Imam is to be immediately appointed by the Word of God and His Messenger (PBUH); They first argue that like all other mercies He is expected to bestow, the appointment of Imam is a mercy of God so that to amend His servant's affairs, and secondly, since Quran requires Imam to be innocent and superior and God is the only aware of the quality of everyone in the universe, He just has the right to endorse the Imamate of Imam, the viewpoint affirmed by Allameh Hilli in his Nahj-ul-Hagh. On the other hand, the Sunni School considers that there is not any text denoting the appointment of Imam neither by God nor by the prophet and the designation of Imam is an election to be done by the people, the viewpoint affirmed by Fazl Ibn Roozbehan in Ibtal-ul-Batil. This thesis comparatively surveys viewpoints of the two scholars, representatives of two Mainstreams of thought in the Muslim world, firstly to clarify the original thought of Shia, secondly to respond to the enemies of Imamyya School, and thirdly to revise their probable commonalities to be employed for the closeness of Shia and Sunni Muslims.
yadollah dadjoo
Abstract
.یکی از باورهای قطعی مسلمانان این است که با پیامبر گرامی اسلام« صلی الله علیه وآله و سلم » باب نبوت و رسالت برای همیشه بسته شده و پس از آن حضرت کسی به عنوان پیامبر ...
Read More
.یکی از باورهای قطعی مسلمانان این است که با پیامبر گرامی اسلام« صلی الله علیه وآله و سلم » باب نبوت و رسالت برای همیشه بسته شده و پس از آن حضرت کسی به عنوان پیامبر ظهور نخواهد کردوخاتمیت تحقق می یابد. پس از پیامبر اسلام تبیین و تبلیغ دین توسط امامان معصوم و اوصیاء به حق آن حضرت انجام خواهد شد. اصل و اساس خاتمیت بر چند پایه استوار است که عبارتند از جاودانگی و جامعیت و دارای مراتب بودن دین اسلام و این که کمال دین، آن را جاودانه نموده و پس از طی مراحل و مراتب مختلف به عنوان دین کامل در اسلام تجلی یافته است. برخی از نویسندگان معاصربر این باورند که وحی مربوط به دوران غریزه است و حاکمیت آن تا زمان ظهور اسلام حجیت خود را حفظ نمود، ولی با ظهور عقل تجربی و استقرایی پیوستگی آن با عالم ماوراء طبیعت پایان یافته و باید به چشم یک تجربه کاملاً طبیعی بدان نگریسته و مورد نقد قرار داد وسروش معتقد است پس از پیامبر و ختم نبوت ولایت هیچکس دیگری از ارزش و اعتبار برخوردار نیست ولی ادعای ایشان از استحکام لازم برخوردار نیست .این روشنفکران تحلیل و تفسیری از خاتمیت مطرح کرده اند که با دلایل عقلی و نقلی سازگاری نداردو نتایج نادرستی از آن بروز یافته است .بدین جهت مورد نقد قرار گرفته است.
