Seyed Mojtabi Mirdamadi; mohammadali sohani
Abstract
Consensus is one of the sources of reaching rulings, which may be a source of beliefs as well. In the theological books of Islamic scholars, Shia or Sunni, the reason for consensus has been used to prove some of the doctrines. And what is the criterion of credibility and the scope of its validity? This ...
Read More
Consensus is one of the sources of reaching rulings, which may be a source of beliefs as well. In the theological books of Islamic scholars, Shia or Sunni, the reason for consensus has been used to prove some of the doctrines. And what is the criterion of credibility and the scope of its validity? This research aims to examine the answers to the above questions from the most important theological schools, namely the Imamiyyah, Mu'tazilah, Ash'ari, and Matridiyyah. This research, which is of a fundamental type, has tried to explain the different dimensions of consensus with the analytical and library methods and with the approach of rational and narrative reasoning. In this article, the reasons given for the validity of consensus in matters of belief have been undermined. The most important results obtained in this research are that: the fundamentalists of the Imamiyyah and some Akhbaris accept the authority of consensus based on reason, the Ash'arites accept the authority of consensus through narration, and most of the Mu'tazila and Matridiyya also accept the authenticity of consensus through narration. In this article, there is a flaw in the arguments presented, and Mukhtar's opinion is that: there is no evidence for the validity of consensus in matters of faith.
sayyed mojtaba jalali; ali taheri dehnavi; sayyed hasan jalali
Abstract
Among some Islamic and non-Islamic theologians, various issues have been raised regarding the issue of interpretation and permission or not. The problem of research is to find a common meaning regarding interpretation and expressing a solution in response to doubts about it by analytical and descriptive ...
Read More
Among some Islamic and non-Islamic theologians, various issues have been raised regarding the issue of interpretation and permission or not. The problem of research is to find a common meaning regarding interpretation and expressing a solution in response to doubts about it by analytical and descriptive methods, in which the content of interpretive, theological and hadith sources has been used. Accordingly, the most important achievement of the research is that according to the existing presuppositions in the issue of interpretation and expression of the reasons for the deniers Explaining the criterion, the difference between the basis of the proponents of interpretation) and its defenders (positive verses of interpretation, refusing to carry the attributes of God in apparent meanings, hadiths indicating the permission of interpretation, refusing some texts from obtaining apparent meanings), criticizing them (refuting and resolving) and Despite the differences in the interpretation of the verses, it can be said that the interpretation of the Qur'an and carrying the meaning of the verses contrary to their apparent meanings is permissible in cases where carrying on the appearance of the word requires opposition to the courts of the Qur'an, religion and definite evidence.
