seyydbagher hoseini karimi
Abstract
The approach of the theological and philosophical currents of the Islamic world in the use of reason and the relationship between it and narration has been different. Considering the importance of the opinions of Seyyed Morteza and Allameh Tabataba'i regarding the meaning, authority, and relationship ...
Read More
The approach of the theological and philosophical currents of the Islamic world in the use of reason and the relationship between it and narration has been different. Considering the importance of the opinions of Seyyed Morteza and Allameh Tabataba'i regarding the meaning, authority, and relationship between reason and narration, we tried to study this issue comparatively from the perspective of these two nobles. research method: the present research has studied the title of this research descriptively and analytically until it reaches the desired result. research findings: Seyyed Morteza considers reason to mean the set of sciences that is obtained for the oblige. Allameh refers to the intellect in the sense of human cognition, and the truth of the human soul as evidence. From the point of view of these two nobles, the authority of the intellect is inherent in it and is considered as a source of knowledge. From the point of view of these two, each of the intellect and narration, while having their own realm, but in many cases, confirm each other. They have a similar view on the discussion of the conflict between reason and narration.
Alireza Shah Fazl Ghamsari
Abstract
The purpose of this article is a comparative study of Rashid Reza's views on the interpretation of Al-Manar and Allameh Tabataba'i in Al-Mizan on the issue of intercession in the Holy Qur’an. This article is a descriptive-analytical study of the views of these two thinkers. The consequences are ...
Read More
The purpose of this article is a comparative study of Rashid Reza's views on the interpretation of Al-Manar and Allameh Tabataba'i in Al-Mizan on the issue of intercession in the Holy Qur’an. This article is a descriptive-analytical study of the views of these two thinkers. The consequences are that Rashid Reza, while examining the verses related to intercession, believes that the verses of the Qur'an do not indicate the existence of intercession on the Day of Resurrection and that the only savior of mankind is his good deeds. According to Rashid Reza, there is no inconsistency between the verses of intercession. Expressing a rational argument for the denial of intercession, he says: Intercession for the rulers of the world is either based on ignorance or based on injustice, and both cases about God are excluded. Allameh Tabataba'i believes that the verses of the Qur'an are sufficient to explain the issue of intercession and by carefully examining the verses of the Qur'an, one can derive the Qur'anic view in this regard. The reason why intercession is completely rejected in some verses is that God wants to deny independent intercession, and the verses that indicate the existence of intercession with God's permission prove the existence of intercession non-independently and by God's will. According to Allameh, intercession is an opportunity for God's mercy on the Day of Resurrection, and with intercession, neither ignorance of God will be removed nor will God benefit. In addition to the afterlife effect, intercession also has a worldly effect so that people are directed towards the intercessors. The conclusion is that the verses of the Qur'an have a definite implication on the issue of intercession and clearly state that intercession is both intellectually and incidentally possible
Hamid malekmakan; fatemeh khansanami; shabanali khansanami
Abstract
Paying attention to the literal meaning of the word messenger and prophet in the Qur'an, and when they are addressed as messengers when they are prophets, is an important point that has received less attention from Quranic scholars. Some have interpreted both as meaningful and a group as a meaningful ...
Read More
Paying attention to the literal meaning of the word messenger and prophet in the Qur'an, and when they are addressed as messengers when they are prophets, is an important point that has received less attention from Quranic scholars. Some have interpreted both as meaningful and a group as a meaningful contrast between the words of the Prophet and the Messenger. The present study examines the views of Fakhr Razi and Allameh tabataba'i using library and descriptive-analytical methods. Fakhr Razi considers the criterion for choosing a prophet to be only the prayers of God by God and considers the prophet to mean a human being who is different from other people through revelation. According to Fakhr Razi, such a person becomes a messenger whenever he is commissioned to propagate revelation. He also considers the relationship between the two to be general and especially absolute. But according to Allameh Tabataba'i, the Prophet is a person who expresses to the people what is good for their livelihood and resurrection, and the Messenger is the one who carries a special mission, including the completion of a proof that seeks to oppose that torment and destruction and the like. Therefore, according to Allameh, the mission is a special and superfluous description of prophecy. Therefore, according to the above definition, it can be said that what Allameh knows as a "Prophet" is "Messenger" according to Fakhr Razi.
