Fahime Maghferat; Abbasali Farahati
Abstract
The first person, after the Holy Qur'an and the Messenger of God (PBUH), who spoke in the field of theology and raised and expressed theological topics, and his words became the source of this science, is Amirul Momineen Imam Ali (peace be upon him). By examining the different views of scholars, especially ...
Read More
The first person, after the Holy Qur'an and the Messenger of God (PBUH), who spoke in the field of theology and raised and expressed theological topics, and his words became the source of this science, is Amirul Momineen Imam Ali (peace be upon him). By examining the different views of scholars, especially Sunni scholars, and examining the historical circumstances of the three caliphs from the confessions of the Sunnis and Mu'tazila, this claim can be confirmed. The infallible imams (peace be upon them) are among the first students of theological and theological sciences of Amir al-Mu'minin (peace be upon them), and after them, their students are Muslim scholars and theologians. Except for the Shiite thinkers, who are influenced by Imam (a.s.), in this article, by examining the works of Muslim scholars and theologians from the Sunnis, Mu'tazila and Ash'arites, their direct or indirect influence on the revealed teachings of the Commander of the Faithful, Imam Ali (a.s.) Assalam) has been paid. By examining the views of Sunni theologians such as Jahiz Basri, Abul Hasan Ash'ari, Qazi Abdul Jabbar, Fakhr Razi and Ghazali, the conclusion is reached that they are indebted to Amir al-Mu'minin Imam Ali (peace be upon him) in their theological views.
Reza Baniasadi; Fatemeh Ghoveh Nadooghan
Abstract
Ibn Taymiyyah criticized Allama Helli's rational argument about the Imamate of Imam Ali (a.s.), which he presented using the necessity of Imam's infallibility. While he generally does not accept the divine appointment of the Imam, he also rejects and does not accept the argument of the Imam's infallibility. ...
Read More
Ibn Taymiyyah criticized Allama Helli's rational argument about the Imamate of Imam Ali (a.s.), which he presented using the necessity of Imam's infallibility. While he generally does not accept the divine appointment of the Imam, he also rejects and does not accept the argument of the Imam's infallibility. In fact, Ibn Taymiyyah's objections to the necessity of infallibility in the imam return to the denial of the principle of Imamate in the sense intended by the Shia; Because by accepting the Imamate in the intended sense of the Shia, there is no escaping the acceptance of infallibility and, following it, the Imamate of Imam Ali (a.s.). This article is written in a descriptive-analytical way and aims to express the issue of the strength and power of Allameh Helli's argument on the Imamate of Imam Ali (a.s.), and in fact, it answers the question whether Ibn Taymiyyah's objections to the first rational argument of Allameh Helli prove Imam Ali's Imamate. (A) Is it included? By reflecting on the problems of Ibn Taymiyyah, it is clear from Allama Helli's rational argument on the Imamate of Imam Ali (a.s.) that his opinions are rejected, that the confirmation of Allamah's argument and, as a result, the proof of the Imamate of Imam Ali (a.s.) and, consequently, other Shia imams follow has it.
